From 0f0a885f1c368bf5a4406955947982bb97fd08ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Jacobsson <jonjac-6@student.ltu.se>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 18:28:53 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update rtic_bare2.rs

---
 examples/rtic_bare2.rs | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/examples/rtic_bare2.rs b/examples/rtic_bare2.rs
index 366791c..fcc408f 100644
--- a/examples/rtic_bare2.rs
+++ b/examples/rtic_bare2.rs
@@ -156,7 +156,9 @@ End of assembler dump.
 //    Answer in your own words, why you believe the generated code differs?
 //
 /*
-It starts the wait function where it just loops nops for a certain number of times that fits the wait value. Each time it will remove 1 from r0 and check if it resulted in a negative number or not. If it results in a negative number it will not branch and the wait is over. So if you insert 100 it will probably divide 100 on 8 and then insert the nearest hole number of that in to r0.
+To save space the compiler makes some optimizations in the code.
+So wait is now compiled as a function and takes an argument in r0 instead of 
+just setting a value before it runs.
 */
 //
 //    Commit your answers (bare2_3)
-- 
GitLab